Laissez faire
Laissez faire is a French term which, translated literally, means ‘leave to do’ or ‘leave things as they are’. It is probably a contraction of ‘laissez-nous faire’ - let us do it. It is seen as a product of the 18th century Enlightenment, allowing humans to realise their potential without the hindrance of government. Adam Smith was one of the most famous proponents of laissez-faire and regarded it as a moral philosophy that allowed markets to function as natural, organic systems.
Today, laissez faire has become primarily an economic and political doctrine of the Right which advocates non-intervention (particularly by government) in the running of things in the belief that this will result in the best possible outcomes for everyone. This approach is sometimes called laissez-faire capitalism and involves no government intervention, regulation or the application of tariffs. Businesses are free to develop without any restrictions from government which, in addition, should not interfere in people’s lives. However, when these principles are contravened, the government can be accused of acting like a ‘nanny’ state.
Classic laissez faire is generally at odds with socialism (and to a certain extent liberalism) which tends to advocate maximum state intervention and control of the factors of production – land, labour and capital. However, there is a left-wing brand of laissez-faire also known as left-wing anti capitalism. This claims that true laissez-faire would eventually result in an anti-capitalist society.
Generally, modern British laissez faire opposes state intervention in national policies and in particular, taxation, beyond that required to maintain a minimal state of peace, security and property rights. This was the basic view of Thatcherism, and in particular, of the American economist Milton Friedman. Indeed, advocates of laissez-faire propose a complete absence of government interference, underpinned by a belief in the superior operation of the free market: left to its own devices, it is able through competition to dispense with inefficiencies in a faster and more effective (some would say ruthless) manner than any legislation could do.
Laissez faire is also a type of leadership, sometimes called delegative leadership, in which leaders play a background role and allow group members to make the decisions. It is thought to be effective where the leader is motivated and highly skilled.
Concerning freedom of choice, on a more individual level, laissez faire can mean being able to choose things and certain courses of action without too much control from someone in higher authority.
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
Featured articles and news
HSE simplified advice for installers of stone worktops
After company fined for repeatedly failing to protect workers.
Co-located with 10th year of UK Construction Week.
How orchards can influence planning and development.
Time for knapping, no time for napping
Decorative split stone square patterns in facades.
A practical guide to the use of flint in design and architecture.
Designing for neurodiversity: driving change for the better
Accessible inclusive design translated into reality.
RIBA detailed response to Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report
Briefing notes following its initial 4 September response.
Approved Document B: Fire Safety from March
Current and future changes with historical documentation.
A New Year, a new look for BSRIA
As phase 1 of the BSRIA Living Laboratory is completed.
A must-attend event for the architecture industry.
Caroline Gumble to step down as CIOB CEO in 2025
After transformative tenure take on a leadership role within the engineering sector.
RIDDOR and the provisional statistics for 2023 / 2024
Work related deaths; over 50 percent from construction and 50 percent recorded as fall from height.
Solar PV company fined for health and safety failure
Work at height not properly planned and failure to take suitable steps to prevent a fall.
The term value when assessing the viability of developments
Consultation on the compulsory purchase process, compensation reforms and potential removal of hope value.
Trees are part of the history of how places have developed.